The relationship between India and Pakistan has been marked by decades of tension, conflict, and mistrust. While both nations share historical, cultural, and geographical ties, political disputes particularly over Kashmir have kept them at odds. Unfortunately, India has often resorted to false flag operations to malign Pakistan and justify its aggressive policies. One such incident was the Pahalgam attack, which India blamed on Pakistan without credible evidence.

Pakistan has consistently demonstrated its desire for peace and stability in the region. Despite India’s hostile rhetoric and unprovoked ceasefire violations along the Line of Control (LoC), Pakistan has shown restraint and called for dialogue. Pakistan’s government has repeatedly emphasized the need for peaceful resolution of disputes through diplomacy. Pakistan’s efforts in the war against terrorism are globally recognized, and its sacrifices in countering extremism are undeniable. Moreover, Pakistan has taken concrete steps to curb cross-border militancy, including strict actions against banned outfits. The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) has acknowledged Pakistan’s progress in countering terror financing, further validating its commitment to regional peace.

The Pahalgam attack, where militants allegedly targeted a tourist convoy in Indian-administered Kashmir, was swiftly blamed on Pakistan by Indian authorities. However, no substantial evidence was provided to support these claims. Instead, the incident was used to fuel anti-Pakistan sentiment and justify further military aggression. This is not an isolated incident. India has a history of staging false flag operations to divert attention from its human rights abuses in Kashmir. Narendra Modi’s government has frequently used such tactics to rally nationalist sentiment, distract from domestic failures, and escalate tensions with Pakistan. By portraying Pakistan as a “sponsor of terrorism,” India seeks to legitimize its brutal occupation of Kashmir and avoid international scrutiny over its atrocities in the region. Pakistan remains a responsible state committed to peace, while India continues to engage in propaganda and false flag operations to malign its neighbor. The Indian military and security apparatus have long been accused of orchestrating false flag operations in Indian-administered Kashmir to justify oppressive measures, suppress legitimate Kashmiri resistance, and malign Pakistan. These calculated operations, often involving staged encounters and fabricated narratives, serve India’s political and strategic objectives.

Read Also: Indian Navy’s Myth of Being the Net Security Providers is Busted!

One of the most egregious examples is the 2000 Pathribal fake encounter, where the Indian Army extrajudicially executed five Kashmiri civilians, falsely branding them as militants responsible for the Chittisinghpora massacre. Despite a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) probe confirming the victims’ innocence, justice was never served. Similarly, the 2009 Machail encounter exposed how Indian troops killed three Kashmiri laborers in a premeditated operation, later claiming they were infiltrators. The 2016 Uri attack, which India swiftly attributed to Pakistan, remains shrouded in suspicion. Discrepancies in official accounts and the involvement of controversial figures like Lt. Col. Prasad Purohit previously linked to other false flag conspiracies raise serious questions about the incident’s authenticity. Likewise, the 2019 Pulwama attack was exploited for political gains, with India hastily blaming Pakistan despite glaring inconsistencies, including the attacker’s local origins and the security forces’ inexplicable negligence. More recently, the 2021 Hyderpora encounter saw Indian forces killing four civilians, including an unarmed doctor, and later conceding under public pressure that at least one victim was “wrongly killed.” The hurried burial of bodies in remote locations further underscored attempts to conceal evidence.

India manipulates crises to fuel anti-Pakistan rhetoric, legitimize its occupation of Kashmir, and evade accountability. The international community must scrutinize such operations and demand transparency. Pakistan, meanwhile, continues to advocate for peaceful resolution through dialogue, urging global stakeholders to recognize India’s disinformation campaigns and address the systemic injustices faced by Kashmiris. Until India abandons its deceptive tactics and ends its repression in Kashmir, regional stability will remain unattainable.

The pursuit of peace between India and Pakistan is often misconstrued as a sign of concession or weakness, particularly by hawkish elements in New Delhi. However, history has proven that sustained hostility only deepens suffering especially for Kashmiris while draining both nations of resources that could be channeled toward progress. Pakistan has consistently extended an olive branch, advocating for dialogue and conflict resolution, but India’s aggressive posturing, false flag operations, and propaganda driven policies have obstructed meaningful reconciliation. True strength lies not in perpetual antagonism, but in the courage to seek diplomatic solutions. Pakistan’s calls for peace should not be mistaken for frailty; rather, they reflect a mature understanding that war benefits neither nation. India’s refusal to engage in good-faith negotiations, its suppression of Kashmiri voices, and its reliance on fabricated narratives only perpetuate instability.